HomeClimate Change NewsThe difference between land surface temperature and surface air temperature

The difference between land surface temperature and surface air temperature

The difference between land surface temperature and surface air temperature

Posted on 2 August 2023 by John Mason

Tarmac melts at around 50oC, depending on its exact composition. That’s according to the Road Surface Treatments Association, who ought to know about such things.

What’s that got to do with this subject? Well, most people are familiar with melted tarmac on sunny summer days, yet few of the world’s countries have ever recorded surface air temperatures of 50oC – yet. But it doesn’t need surface air temperatures that high to melt tarmac. Tarmac is dark and that means, like other dark surfaces, it absorbs almost all incoming Solar radiation. The result is that on a clear sunny summer’s day, tarmac can get very hot indeed when local surface air temperatures are just 35°C or so.

The current, verified European maximum surface air temperature was recorded on 11th August 2021, when it reached 48.8°C in Floridia, a town in the Sicilian province of Syracuse in the Mediterranean. This year, so far, in a prolonged heatwave beginning in the second week of July, Syracuse in Sicily recorded 47.8°C on July 24th (to be verified), while Jerzu, Sardinia, recorded 48.2°C on the same day – if verified, the hottest July day on record for Europe. 40-46°C was recorded widely from Spain across to the Greek Islands, on multiple days. That’s horribly hot by most standards, regardless of whether records do fall or not.

With this 48°C heatwave coming to an end, we can look at some emerging mythology around it, starting here:

This headline and accompanying blog was republished at Watts Up With That (WUWT) on July 19th 2023 and has been archived for future reference here: WUWT serves as a sort of amplifier, one among many, for stories and conspiracy theories emerging in various dimly-lit corners of the Internet.

The trouble with stuff like this is that once amplified, it goes viral thanks to social media. The core of this emergent climate myth was the fictitious (to put it mildly) claim that the European Space Agency (ESA) had done something very, very naughty:

tweeted claim

Tweet, posted on 14th July 2023, archived here.

I went to the relevant, linked-to ESA page, also archived here, for a look. On Thursday July 13th, they said:

“Temperatures are sizzling across Europe this week amid an intense and prolonged period of heat. And it’s only just begun. Italy, Spain, France, Germany and Poland are all facing a major heatwave with air temperatures expected to climb to 48°C on the islands of Sicily and Sardinia – potentially the hottest temperatures ever recorded in Europe.”

Hmm. Well it had only just begun. The following week – in many places – temperatures shot up into the mid-40s, climaxing with that unverified 48.2°C on the 24th in Sardinia. Not all-time record-busting – but uncomfortably close. This is the ECMWF 2m temperature forecast for midday on July 18th, for example:

Forecast temperatures ecm 18-07-2023

Surface air temperatures from 36-44°C were expected widely over Spain, Sardinia, Sicily, the Italian Mainland and in parts of Greece. Those are not forecast land surface temperatures. Surface air temperature maximum values recorded on the 19th, on the very same day the WUWT blogger was decrying the heatwave as pure invention, were as follows:

Greece – Kalamata, 42°C; warmest overnight minimum Kalymnos, 30°C
Italy – Decimomannu, 46°C; warmest overnight minimum Mesina, 29°C
Spain – Malaga AP/Alora, 44.2°C; warmest overnight minimum Malaga Met Centre, 31.1°C

The way surface air temperatures are measured is explained by the UK Met Office, also archived here:

“A platinum resistance thermometer (PRT) is used for the measurement of air temperature at all synoptic stations and all supplementary stations that employ an automatic system. The thermometer is exposed in a Stevenson screen at a height of 1.25 m above the ground and aspirated only by natural ventilation through the side louvers.”

One of the reasons for measuring the surface air temperature above the ground is that this point samples the average temperature over a distance of a hundred metres or more upwind. The air is not being heated by the single point directly underneath the thermometer, but by all the surfaces that exist through that hundred metres. Even though the land surface temperature will be very different between e.g. a tarmac surface and a lawn, the air temperature at 1.25 m above the ground will be pretty uniform and thus representative of local conditions. Mixing of the variably-warmed air through turbulent flow smooths it all out.

Land surface temperatures are, however, also recorded and are obviously useful too. Here is a land surface temperature map for the morning of July 17th 2023:

land surface temperature-17-07-23

You will immediately note that there is a difference between the two charts. In the ECM surface air temperature forecast chart, temperatures were expected to reach the low to middle 40s. But in the land surface temperature observations map, the ground in some of the same spots is hitting 50C. It’s worth making the point again: on a sunny day in a heatwave, many land surfaces become hotter than the air – that’s how tarmac can melt in a sunny spot. This image uses data from the Copernicus Sentinel-3 mission’s radiometer instrument.

The ESA say (also archived here):

“The Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) is a dual-view scanning temperature radiometer, which flies in low Earth orbit (800 – 830 km altitude). There are currently two instruments in orbit, on board the Sentinel-3A and Sentinel-3B satellites. Sentinel-3 is an operational mission that is part of the Copernicus programme.

The principal objective of SLSTR products is to provide global and regional Sea and Land Surface Temperature (SST, LST) to a very high level of accuracy (better than 0.3 K for SST) for both climatological and meteorological applications. There is also provision of aerosol retrieval and fire radiative power information as additional products.

One of the primary mission objectives of the SLSTR instrument is to extend the long-term, consistent set of global Sea Surface Temperature (SST) measurements. SLSTR provides data continuity back to 1991 as its data permit the continuation of data-sets from previous instruments: Along Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR) on ERS-1, ATSR-2 on ERS-2 and the Advanced Along Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) on Envisat.”

So there you have it. The ESA have been monitoring land surface temperatures from space since 1991. Surface air temperatures and land surface temperatures have both been recorded for years and the, “48°C Horror That Never Was”, did happen in this heatwave (subject to verification), after many days during which severe heat conditions had persisted. More importantly, the prolonged nature of the heatwave and also the very high overnight minima would have had the most severe impacts in terms of human health.

Almost exactly a year ago, I commented on a second emergent climate myth here at Skeptical Science, in a post marking the first instances (yes, multiple) of 40oC being recorded in the UK during that year’s heatwave. This other myth involved stating that old forecast graphics did not have all those scary shades of red on them – indicating high temperatures. Never mind that similar colour-scales have been used for almost as long as I’ve been alive (60 years plus). I’ve always understood that blue colours mean cold, red ones hot. It says so on the taps of most sinks and baths, so why others do not understand this remains one of life’s mysteries. The ‘changing colours’ talking-point is still wild out there, a year later, to the extent that the UK Met Office published an explainer about the colour-scale on their official blog on July 27th. To put it simply, the maps are turning more red at times because it’s darned hotter at times. No conspiracy: nothing more to see. Move along now.

People who create and/or circulate such myths are denying plain reality. That reality is that it got extremely hot across southern Europe for a prolonged period in July 2023. Such prolonged heat is a serious health-hazard, never mind the appalling wildfires that made the headlines this week. Science has long predicted a greater frequency and greater intensity of heatwaves and that is exactly what is happening. As one-time UK Prime Minister Harold Macmillan commented when he was asked what was the greatest challenge for a statesman: “Events, dear boy, events“. Likewise, events will become an increasingly awkward challenge to those who continue to insist there’s nothing untoward going on with our climate.


Source link


Most Popular

Recent Comments